Jared Leto's Joker Has Tattoos....SO WHAT!?

By Kevin J. Kessler

We've all seen Jared Leto as The Joker by now. The below image was released to celebrate the character's 75th anniversary in comics, and to say that it caused some controversy would be QUITE the understatement . 

But why did the fandom universe have such a visceral reaction to this never before seen, inked up version of one of the most iconic characters of all time? Let's take a look-see. 

There you have it. Pretty different, huh? No wonder comic book fans reacted as they did. This is a rather extreme departure from the days of Jack Nicholson, or the much beloved Heath Ledger. Different indeed....But to that, I pose the question, is different such a bad thing??? 

There's no denying Nicholson's Joker was iconic. For many of us, he was our first Joker. But I have always held true to the belief that while he's playing an excellent character, he's not playing THE JOKER as the character is classically portrayed in the comic books.

Heeeeeeeeeere's Joker!

Heeeeeeeeeere's Joker!

Jack was a gangster. Albeit a deformed gangster with a penchant for laughter, but he was a gangster none the less. He was a crook, a criminal, a common hood (pun intended for you comic fans!). Did he murder anyone just because it was funny? Nope. Everything had an element of crime to it. 

No let's look at Heath. I'm going to take the unpopular opinion on this one and say that Heath Ledger was not a strong Joker. He was PHENOMENAL at playing the face painted scarred terrorist written for him in this film; but he is not The Joker.

Why so serious? SMILE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!!!

Why so serious? SMILE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!!!

He's an anarchist for sure. He's a deranged psycho killer who wants to prove that everyone is just like him under the flesh masks they wear every day. It's a remarkable concept and character. But it isn't The Joker. Heath wasn't Joker because he found nothing FUNNY. That's the whole spirit of the character. He finds EVERYTHING funny. Everything is a joke to him. Murder, blood, death, it all gives him a case of the yuck-yucks.

So, with that being said, no one as of yet has combined that perfect amount of crazy, sadism, and humor. Who is to say that under all of those tattoos, that isn't Jared Leto? But we will get to what lies beneath in a moment. For now, Let's examine some of the physical features everyone seems to hate. 

The Tear Drop: On Joker's cheek, there seems to be a tear drop in the shape of the letter J. In the criminal world, one brands themselves with a tear drop when they've committed a murder. I'm sure Joker has taken MANY lives at this point, so what one death could have been so poignant that it merits this display of body art? Well for that, I give you....

The Robin's Wing: On Joker's right arm, we can see what appears to be a Robin's wing. This can mean one very important thing. This is a Joker who has killed Robin. Specifically, if we're going by comic book lore here, Jason Todd, the second Robin. That's one of The Joker's crowning achievements. Of course he remembers it fondly, and brands it onto his flesh permanently.

Chest Tattoos: Ok, yes, they're a little one the nose. The HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA's drawn all over his left pectoral and the Jester skull on his right are reminiscent of something a fan-boy might have done on himself to show that he is a Joker fan. But to that point I raise, who is a bigger Joker fan than THE JOKER himself!? He's the ultimate narcissist, plastering his face on EVERYTHING from vehicles to weaponry, to his various abandoned lairs throughout the years! He believes his own hype. That being said, how often will you see him with his shirt off? These don't really matter as much. 

"Damaged": Ok, this is the one I'm with you guys on. The cursive "Damaged" written across his forehead is a little odd. First of all, nobody this side of Mike Tyson can really pull off a full out face tattoo anymore. But my main problem stems from the fact that Joker would NEVER see himself as Damaged. To him, he's the normal one and we're all just uptight morons who don't get his humor. So this one, to me, seems a bit out of place. Unless of course it's meant to mock us all. "You think I'm damaged? Let me show you how much your labels mean to me!" Actually, by putting that spin on it, I kinda like it! 

The Grill: This is far and away my favorite aspect of Leto's Joker appearance. People need to chill about this. He doesn't have a grill because he's a thug! He has a grill because BATMAN PUNCHED HIS TEETH OUT OF HIS STUPID FACE IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE! Seriously, one of my favorite shots in any Batman/Joker comic is when Batman beats Justice into his arch enemy's face, usually knocking teeth out. Yet he always has teeth again next time we see him! How is this possible? HE GETS FAKE METAL TEETH! It's perfect. Honestly I'm shocked the comics have never used that concept as a design. It gives his smile (the most important aspect of the Joker, which Ledger never did) a more unnatural and terrifying appearance. I freaking love it. And, If Batman punched out his teeth post Jason Todd murdering, OR even the paralysis of Barbara Gordon, then all the better! 

The Eyes: Ok so there lies the physical, but to me, as I've stated on Geek WatchTower MANY times, the costume or appearance doesn't mean as much to me as the EYES of a character. When I look into Jared Leto's eyes in this photo, I see perfect absolute nothingness. I see a sociopath. I see the mania that has been missing from the eyes of all Jokers who came before him. He gets this role. You can tell. And if you were lucky enough to see the leaked set videos which showcase his conversation with Harleen Quinzell, you'll see he has the mannerisms down perfectly as well. He has a flair for the dramatic. Broad arm gestures are the name of this game!

Ledger's Joker was very quiet and terrifying in his awkwardness. Nicholson chewed the scenery to shreds (which works in that movie!). But the Joker is theatrical. He is LOUD. He is OVERBEARING. And judging by what I see, this may be just that!

Just remember one thing before you all judge. Everyone hated the idea of Downey Junior as Iron Man. Everyone hated Heath Ledger being cast as The Joker. Everyone hated Chris Evans being cast as Captain America. But didn't they all work out fine? 

When Suicide Squad releases, I will be there opening night with BELLS on! (not literally) And once we see what Mr. Leto has in store for us as the new clown prince of crime, I will be there to say it. "I informed you, thusly!" 

The Booth Window - Mad Max Review

THE BOOTH WINDOW: EARLY SCREENING REVIEWS

By Chris Pribilski

I’ve been a movie theatre manager for a while now, and one of the perks is the early screenings.  Studios don’t do it for all features, but for most they’ll offer an early screening of a movie for booking agents to attend.  The process has gone through many changes over the years, but I still get the invites, and I’ve never had to sign a disclosure agreement, so let me tell you what I thought without spoiling anything!

Screening time!  Watching Mad Max: Fury Road!

**Any plot points that I allude to or flat out tell you can be gotten from the previous Mad Max movies, shorts, and the various trailers.  NO SPOILERS!!**

Back in the 80s TV was VERY different than it is now.  Our neighborhood was one of the last to get cable, so we were limited to three or four channels; more if we could ornately attach enough metal to the TV antenna.  Our TV remote was the youngest sibling, and that old tube TV also functioned as a space heater. 

Our grandfather’s neighborhood was the first to get cable, so we saw all kinds of new television there that we couldn’t get at home.  While we got our share of the USA Cartoon Express and Fraggle Rock, Grandpa preferred the dusty westerns of John Wayne and Clint Eastwood. It was in those days that I had last seen a Mad Max movie.  I had memories of a post-apocalyptic world full of shoulder pads, Mohawks, and car chases.  I had NO idea what I was watching, but it was filled with fast-paced action and some mean, mean people.  The fact that I still remembered iconic scenes and characters from the franchise says something about the successful storytelling of George Miller, the writer, director, and producer of those movies. 

When I heard about this screening I was pretty excited.  This was the type of movie that needed to be rebooted!  Think of how cool the visuals could be with new computer and practical effect techniques!  We’re going back to an “R” rating, not the PG13 that “Beyond Thunderdome” was?  On top of that George Miller is at the helm?  SHWEET!  

I’m happy to say that this film will not disappoint.  This was the first time I’ve been to a screening that played a disclaimer at the front of it, so technically I’m not allowed to discuss the movie.  

They’re even waiting until Thursday, May 14th to have the world premiere.  That’s only hours before theatres are permitted to start early screenings, the official release being the following day.  You’ll notice there are no official reviews on Rotten Tomatoes.  Warner Bros. is also very quiet about potential sequels, but according to an Esquire interview last March, Hardy is attached to do three more Mad Max films.  Still, as is with all franchises, subsequent Mad Max films will depend on the success of “Mad Max: Fury Road.”  Since I also try to be a spoiler-free as possible, I will once again limit my review to what can be gleamed from trailers and those plot-lines that have already been released.

Who knew Lizards were so tasty?

Who knew Lizards were so tasty?

The story seems to take place after the first “Mad Max” film and sometime before “Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior.”  Max still has the "last of the V8 interceptors,” and [20+ year spoiler] that vehicle was destroyed in the second movie.  So this movie isn’t a prequel as much as a “re-booting sequel,” bridging the gap between the first two films.  Max’s voice-over work in the trailer is indicative of the internal struggle he’s having after the events in the first movie and his external struggle to survive.  In a way, this is one of the weaknesses of the film.  The degradation of the social landscape is so intense that is seems like the world’s been like this for a long, long time.  Still, this is a “speed bump” in the film’s storytelling and only raises an eyebrow when trying to incorporate it in the series.  The rewards of a long established apocalyptic landscape make for a wonderfully detailed and imaginative environment with a host of exciting yet disturbing characters.  

You don’t need to watch the previous movies to enjoy this one.  If you’re new to the series Max’s internal struggles may be a bit confusing (they kinda are even if you’ve seen the previous movie), but they don’t take away from the narrative of the story.  If anything they seem justified in this chaotic landscape.  This movie stands on its own very well.  If you enjoy this movie you’ll simply want to watch “Mad Max” to get Max’s backstory.  If you like action movies set in a post-apocalyptic landscape filled with crazy characters, you’ll love this flick. 

In this world it’s all about survival.  Your basic needs have been broken down into an easy three: water, fuel, and ammo.  Those that have these three have control and power among the populace.  Just like in the previous films, Max gets caught up in the chaos around him.  In “The Road Warrior” it was through necessity.  In “Beyond Thunderdome” it was from theft.  In “Fury Road” the stakes are higher and much more dire.  Right out the gate we are thrust into a perilous world with our protagonist and left to wonder just how long our hero will be in this movie.

Not Bane

Not Bane

The trailer sets up the story pretty well.  You got the main bad-dude, Immortan Joe (played by Hugh Keays-Byrne, same guy who played main villain Toecutter in “Mad Max,” how cool is that!?!), a pretty sickly dude with a bad-ass mask (don’t worry, no whiney Bane-voice).  We can see in the trailer that he controls the water in the area, thereby controlling the populace.  Imperator Furiosa, played by a robo-armed Charlize Theron, has stolen something from him, something that based on the images of the five babes in white and the removal of a chastity belt we can determine as being pretty important to big ol’ pasty Joe. 

There’s a bit more backstory provided, showing us the social structure of Immortan Joe’s domain and establishing his place in the Australian wasteland.  All this just serves to show us why, just like in the trailer, the rest of the movie is one long, violent chase scene.  

It’s a really fun movie, the “R” rating earned not so much from gore or language as much as just the sheer intensity and duration of the violence.  As gross as some of it is, there are no scenes of intense gore, no “if you’re gonna to spew, spew into this” moments.  I really appreciated that Miller used as much practical effects as possible, but man that had to have been dangerous.  And let’s face it, any chase movie that incorporates a giant PA system vehicle fronted by a dude with a flaming guitar so that the main villain can have his own chase music is gonna be pretty fun. 

This is meant to be a fun summer popcorn movie with a hint of social commentary.  Treat it as such, for there are a few flaws.  Like I said earlier, the timeline feels a bit skewed.  Not only is it hard to determine where in the timeline Max exactly is, but at times he feels like an inexperienced noob in this world and at others a wily badass.  Maybe that’s supposed to be linked to his conflict with his inner demons; hmm, that warrants a second viewing.

The inner-dialogue-haunting stuff (also shown in the trailer, again, no spoilers) doesn’t feel like it’s resolved very well.  If this movie is indeed meant to link “Mad Max” and “The Road Warrior” together, then we expect that by the end of “Fury Road” Max will get his shit together.  In a way the conflict was resolved, but it felt rather anti-climactic; the build-up was a bit more than the payoff.  Still, at least it was there.

The pacing was O.K.  You can tell Miller took a lot of time with all the action scenes; they flowed very well, but by 10 minutes to go I was starting to get the ol’ porcupine ass.  Story resolution felt a little bit rushed, and there where definitely one or two “C’mon” or “No way” moments, but again, this is a fun summer popcorn movie. Miller’s not making “Midnight Cowboy” here. 

The effects were top notch and the cinematography was beautiful.  You felt like you were there. If you aren’t thirsty by the end of this movie and peeling out of the parking lot on your way home then you were on your phone the whole time and not paying attention to this movie.

See the movie in 3D if you can.  This movie is action, action, action, and the 3D does a good job of enhancing that.  Warner Bros. has a bad track record with 3D, but they keep getting better at it and this is probably their best so far.  There are a few cheese 3D moments, but they are in “appropriate” places.

I hope you have fun!  Sorry I couldn’t tell you more, but really you have all you need to go on, just sit back and enjoy!

** As you will forever hear me say, please, please watch the movie at an independent/local movie chain if you can, and be sure to buy SOMETHING from the concessions.  I know concessions are expensive, but the building doesn’t make much money off the tickets.  If you like the theatre you go to, support them by buying at least a small popcorn, that alone will be a huge help.  Sneak the rest of your stuff in ;).**